My life since 1983 in digest form

April 23rd, 2009 § 0

I’m very late but I finally feel I am on the right path, even though its one that is unnerving at times. I started out in metaphysics/esoteric/occult studies and started hanging out with folks from Campus Crusade when I got to college. In 1983 I went through the Evangelical Initiation (Prayed the “Sinner’s Prayer,” Got baptised. Etc.) I abandoned my previous studies and started to believe that all that was OTD (of the devil). They, my fellow churchgoers, told me that I had to sacrifice my mind to Christ and other such nonsense. I was never able to do that successfully and I found that the people who were didn’t have much to sacrifice. So I bumped into walls a lot and have had a spotty church attendance record over the years. I was one of those quasi-literalists doing a bad job of balancing figurative vs. literal. I did try. In fact I feel I gave it quite an effort, following the prescriptions for success and belief.

My BA is in Hebrew. During my studies I found errors in the Bible and made the mistake of trying to point it out during a Sunday School class I was teaching. You didn’t have to use much imagination to visualise the minds closing as if they were fitted with apertures like a camera. The entire class started reconfirming the inerrancy doctrine. So I’ve meandered from denomination to denomination since 1983, trying to cling to certain core beliefs about the universe and Christ.

Well in 2003 I turned 40 and I guess I had started to go through a perspective shift before that but that’s when I really noticed it. I walked away from the Republican party and left the Evangelical church. I converted to Eastern Orthodoxy in 2004. In 2008 I started watching videos from the alternative media/Patriot movement such as David Icke’s work and Esoteric Agenda and Zeitgeist and several other Gigs of video I have on my HD right now. I am not leaving the church but I have resumed the studies that I began when I was 15. My hope now is to make up for lost time as far as that is possible. I am checking out Buddhist teachings right now and am exploring spirituality.

A Knock on the Door

January 2nd, 2009 § 0

This morning there was a knock at my door. When I answered the door I found a well groomed, nicely dressed couple.

The man spoke first: “Hi! I’m John, and this is Mary.”

Mary: “Hi! We’re here to invite you to come kiss Hank’s ass with us.”

Me: “Pardon me?! What are you talking about? Who’s Hank, and why would I want to kiss his ass?”

John: “If you kiss Hank’s ass, he’ll give you a million dollars; and if you don’t, he’ll kick the shit out of you.”

Me: “What? Is this some sort of bizarre mob shake-down?”

John: “Hank is a billionaire philanthropist. Hank built this town. Hank owns this town. He can do what ever he wants, and what he wants is to give you a million dollars, but he can’t until you kiss his ass.”

Me: “That doesn’t make any sense. Why…”

Mary: “Who are you to question Hank’s gift? Don’t you want a million dollars? Isn’t it worth a little kiss on the ass?”

Me: “Well maybe, if it’s legit, but…”

John: “Then come kiss Hank’s ass with us.”

Me: “Do you kiss Hank’s ass often?”

Mary: “Oh yes, all the time…”

Me: “And has he given you a million dollars?”

John: “Well no, you don’t actually get the money until you leave town.”

Me: “So why don’t you just leave town now?”

Mary: “You can’t leave until Hank tells you to, or you don’t get the money, and he kicks the shit out of you.”

Me: “Do you know anyone who kissed Hank’s ass, left town, and got the million dollars?”

John: “My mother kissed Hank’s ass for years. She left town last year, and I’m sure she got the money.”

Me: “Haven’t you talked to her since then?”

John: “Of course not, Hank doesn’t allow it.”

Me: “So what makes you think he’ll actually give you the money if you’ve never talked to anyone who got the money?”

Mary: “Well, he gives you a little bit before you leave. Maybe you’ll get a raise; maybe you’ll win a small lotto; maybe you’ll just find a twenty dollar bill on the street.”

Me: “What’s that got to do with Hank?”

John: “Hank has certain connections.”

Me: “I’m sorry, but this sounds like some sort of bizarre con game.”

John: “But it’s a million dollars, can you really take the chance? And remember, if you don’t kiss Hank’s ass he’ll kick the shit of you.”

Me: “Maybe if I could see Hank, talk to him, get the details straight from him…”

Mary: “No one sees Hank, no one talks to Hank.”

Me: “Then how do you kiss his ass?”

John: “Sometimes we just blow him a kiss, and think of his ass. Other times we kiss Karl’s ass, and he passes it on.”

Me: “Who’s Karl?”

Mary: “A friend of ours. He’s the one who taught us all about kissing Hank’s ass. All we had to do was take him out to dinner a few times.”

Me: “And you just took his word for it when he said there was a Hank, that Hank wanted you to kiss his ass, and that Hank would reward you?”

John: “Oh no! Karl’s got a letter Hank sent him years ago explaining the whole thing. Here’s a copy; see for yourself.”

John handed me a photocopy of a handwritten memo on “From the desk of Karl” letterhead. There were eleven items listed:

01. Kiss Hank’s ass and he’ll give you a million dollars when you leave town.
02. Use alcohol in moderation.
03. Kick the shit out of people who aren’t like you.
04. Eat right.
05. Hank dictated this list himself.
06. The moon is made of green cheese.
07. Everything Hank says is right.
08. Wash your hands after going to the bathroom.
09. Don’t drink.
10. Eat your wieners on buns, no condiments.
11. Kiss Hank’s ass or he’ll kick the shit out of you.

    Me: “This would appear to be written on Karl’s letterhead.”

    Mary: “Hank didn’t have any paper.”

    Me: “I have a hunch that if we checked we’d find this is Karl’s handwriting.”

    John: “Of course, Hank dictated it.”

    Me: “I thought you said no one gets to see Hank?”

    Mary: “Not now, but years ago he would talk to some people.”

    Me: “I thought you said he was a philanthropist. What sort of philanthropist kicks the shit out of people just because they’re different?”

    Mary: “It’s what Hank wants, and Hank’s always right.”

    Me: “How do you figure that?”

    Mary: “Item 7 says Everything Hanks says is right.’ That’s good enough for me!”

    Me: “Maybe your friend Karl just made the whole thing up.”

    John: “No way! Item 5 says ‘Hank dictated this list himself.’ Besides, item 2 says ‘Use alcohol in moderation,’ item 4 says ‘Eat right,’ and item 8 says ‘Wash your hands after going to the bathroom.’ Everyone knows those things are right, so the rest must be true, too.”

    Me: “But #9 says ‘Don’t Drink,’ which doesn’t quite go with #2. And #6 says ‘The moon is made of green cheese,’ which is just plain wrong.”

    John: “There’s no contradiction between 9 and 2; 9 just clarifies 2. As to 6, you’ve never been to the moon, so you can’t say for sure.”

    Me: “Scientists have pretty firmly established that the moon is made of rock…”

    Mary: “But they don’t know if the rock came from the Earth, or from out of space, so it could just as easily be green cheese.”

    Me: “I’m not really an expert, but I think the theory that the Moon came from the Earth has been discounted. Besides, not knowing where the rock came from doesn’t make it cheese.”

    John: “Aha! You just admitted that scientists make mistakes, but we know Hank is always right!”

    Me: “We do?”

    Mary: “Of course we do, Item 5 says so.”

    Me: “You’re saying Hank’s always right because the list says so, the list is right because Hank dictated it, and we know that Hank dictated it because the list says so. That’s circular logic, no different than saying ‘Hank’s right because he says he’s right.’”

    John: “Now you’re getting it! It’s so rewarding to see someone come around to Hank’s way of thinking.”

    Me: “But…oh, never mind. What’s the deal with wieners?”

    Mary blushes. John says: “Wieners, in buns, no condiments. It’s Hank’s way. Anything else is wrong.”

    Me: “What if I don’t have a bun?”

    John: “No bun, no wiener. A wiener without a bun is wrong.”

    Me: “No relish? No Mustard?”

    Mary looks positively stricken. John shouts: “There’s no need for such language! Condiments of any kind are wrong!”

    Me: “So a big pile of sauerkraut with some wieners chopped up in it would be out of the question?”

    Mary sticks her fingers in her ears: “I am not listening to this. La la la, la la, la la la.”

    John: “That’s disgusting. Only some sort of evil deviant would eat that…”

    Me: “It’s good! I eat it all the time.”

    Mary faints. John catches her: “Well, if I’d known you where one of those I wouldn’t have wasted my time. When Hank kicks the shit out of you I’ll be there, counting my money and laughing. I’ll kiss Hank’s ass for you, you bunless cut-wienered kraut-eater.”

    With this, John dragged Mary to their waiting car, and sped off.

    Christians – Not all of a piece

    November 22nd, 2008 § 0

    If Evangelicals had the same dedication to one another of the Freemasonic Lodge Members, Obama would have had a much more difficult task at winning the election. Former Candidate Mike Huckabee’s recent chastising of certain Christian leaders for throwing their support behind the other Republican candidates is perfect evidence of the fact. The words “brother” and “sister” get thrown around a lot but it only goes so deep. In any crisis there is always going to be a sort of “turtling” effect. People tend to show their first concern for what they consider to be their inner circle. That’s a part of human nature and is not confined to any religion but that’s not going to lessen the bewilderment amongst people who think they’re doing everything right as our country moves through the months and years of these economic crashes.

    The pitfalls of blindly following a leader

    October 20th, 2008 § 0

    This is a cursory analysis of the notion that George W. Bush is a born again Christian and is therefore justified in the mindless following that he enjoys in nooks and crannies all over the country. I will not go into anything that I’ve heard about what goes on at the Skull and Bones fraternity as it is not relevant to this discussion.

    He says he’s a converted follower of Jesus Christ, AKA born again. While that carries a great deal of weight with Christians sometimes they get inextricably caught in an emotional undertow and follow a person too far and for too long. They get on autopilot and disconnect from any critical analysis of a person’s actions against what they have said. I believe this is what has happened among many of the “churched masses” across the country, with this president.

    He has been a member of the Skull and Bones club for 40 years. When questioned about it he parrots “It’s so secret we can’t talk about it.” Therefore he puts that ahead of his oath to this nation and anything he has said in the direction of Christ. When a person goes through the conversion process to become a follower of Christ, according to most in evangelical circles, they are expected to turn away (repent) from their past and any associations that contributed to it. They were sinners and have repented of those actions. They are also expected to break ties with everything associated with a previous lifestyle. Now if he said that he had repented and renounced Skull and Bones when he came to Christ he should be willing to talk about his experience. He shouldn’t be saying it’s too secret to talk about. So assuming that his association has been repented of when he became born again, he is holding that oath as above his commitment to Christ.

    A person’s word has to be followed by actions. If he says he is born again Christians can give him benefit of doubt so long as his actions are in line with his words. He has clearly shown difficulty with fidelity in this area on numerous occasions. This is also not a case of someone who is struggling with something like an addiction and keeps repenting and screwing up. The benefit of doubt suggests that such a person’s heart is in the right place and they deserve compassion, sympathy, second chances, and the like.

    Christians are therefore in error by clinging to his previously given word without examining his actions. If anyone thinks I am judging his heart by what I am saying, then look at it this way. The heart is inward. Actions are outward. The people, (everyone) have no business faithfully following a leader who lies and makes no attempt to repent or correct it or own up to it. Such a leader needs to be replaced.

    Lying publicly and then repenting privately is no good either. It just makes it easier to come back and tell more untruths whenever it is deemed necessary. The people who have been deceived deserve an apology. They need to be asked for their forgiveness.

    What’s really sad about all this is that in the minds of many this whole administration will stand squeaky clean despite all that will ever be said to the contrary. So it is quite possible that “history” will judge him as a good president.

    Wrong Perspective

    October 15th, 2008 § 0

    Christians have a problem.

    There’s evil in the world. People all over are rising up to fight it. Christians sit in a WWII pillbox and want to point fingers at everyone and say, “Okay God has raised us up to fight evil so first become one of us. Then join the fight.”

    Narrow perspective. Bad strategy.

    I see God raising up people all over the world to fight the evil. Christians are part of that process. All this infighting amongst those dedicated to preserving good is doing nothing but ensuring lost battle after lost battle.

    Christians & Aliens

    May 28th, 2008 § 2

    The popular Christian perspective on the subject of space aliens says that the aliens are not physical beings from another planet but are in fact demons. According to this theory the ships are either manipulations of light and sound or are actual material objects designed and built by demonic or Satanic technology. The abductions have to do with an attempt to create an angelic/human hybrid or a return of the Nephilim which are mentioned in Genesis and Exodus. If you are interested in reading more on this perspective have a look at Alien Encounters: The Secret Behind The Ufo Phenomenon by Chuck Missler and Mark Eastman.

    While I believe in the existence of demons as part of the angelic “sphere” of creation, I think this way of looking at the UFO/alien phenomena is limiting and feeds into the earth-centered paradigm or strict literal reading of Genesis. The intentions of the US government aren’t always the best in the world and a lot of the advice and assumptions that end up as policy are bad. Something has been going on for most of the last century and continuing into this one that has required a tremendous amount of monetary and intellectual resources to keep the truth from the public. While I don’t think the space demon theory touted in Christian circles was an invention of the government, I do believe it has served their purposes as a tool of misdirection and one that cost them nothing.

    A Parasitical Philosophy

    May 6th, 2008 § 0

    The left/right paradigm under Reaganism taught us that the Democratic party was the party of big government and the Republicans wanted to reduce the size of government and set us free of that. The two parties had the roles of adversary and savior. This was quite an easy fit, philosophically, for Evangelical Christianity. In fact the two have fit so well in so many areas of life and society that to many they are seemingly inextricable. If you’re wondering why there is such insanely strong support amongst many in churches for the policies and the policy makers, that is your answer. This is why you should question everything you’re told whether from podium or pulpit.

    Gross vs. Net: Thoughts on tithing

    January 9th, 2008 § 0

    The question came up years ago whether as Christians we should tithe out of the gross or the net pay. The “conservative” bunch wants us to all think that you take 10% of the gross and the government just does whatever about their part. Well pay wasn’t handled the way we do now when Jesus was in the flesh. Trust me. They weren’t taking taxes out when people sold things or got their pay from their employer. There were tax collectors who went around to gather in the funds and see to it getting to the regional governor for transport to Rome. That appears to be the system that was in place until Rome fell. But during the time of Jesus’ ministry, the Pharisees confronted him about whether to pay the offering or the tax. Jesus said “…render to Caesar that which is Caesar’s and to God that which is God’s. (Matthew 22:21)” It has always looked to me as though Jesus was making a distinction between the two and that therefore we could pay off the net if we wished. When I said that at church I was told that it took “more faith” to pay off of the gross. Well when you get your paycheck, the taxes are gone. Caesar has already taken out his portion and if you don’t give him enough he’ll demand more in April. More faith, less faith, whatever. The money’s gone. You have to take care of whatever other obligations you have in life out of what is left. There is support in scripture for choosing to pay off of the net. St. Paul says let each give what he has purposed in his heart … for God loves a cheerful giver (2 Corinthians 9:7). As a believer you have to make that choice for yourself. I say if you are able pay out of the gross pay out of the gross, if not, pay out of the net. As for the way things are for me right now I am tithing out of the net. I plan to increase the amount as I am able and will eventually be paying out of the gross. As far as other people’s opinions and attempts to beat me down with a faith-bat, I’m not going to worry about all that. I’ll get with God’s CPA on the other side and hash out the details of what should or should not have happened when I see him.

    I have the right attitude. You added crap to your message.

    December 20th, 2007 § 0

    This is probably going to annoy my old buddy Mel, but I think I have a valid point to make.

    Over my years as a Christian I have run across people who say one of the following when they are about to say something they are pretty sure you are not going to like:

    1. I need to tell you something in love.
    2. I want to make sure you receive this in love.

    Now whatever they follow it with that you don’t like, your mere listening to them and not arguing is not sufficient. For them to be satisfied with this message delivery you have to accept it the way they want you to. What they seem to also be saying is not only that they want you to receive the message in love but that God wants you to receive the message in love. In every case I was made to feel that if I didn’t say that I was receiving it in love I was twice wrong. What I didn’t tell the person was that I didn’t really care anything about the “love” part. Just tell me what you do or don’t want. I’ll listen and agree or not. And we leave it at that. Anything more is presumptuous religious pop culture rigmarole.

    Where Am I?

    You are currently browsing entries tagged with Christianity at Inverse Paradigm.